Ontology

ADMSSW

Asset Description Metadata Schema for Software (ADMS.SW)

This is the RDF encoding of the Asset Description Metadata Schema for Software, developed under the European Union's ISA Programme, specifically under SEMIC Phase II, directed by Szabolcs Szekacs of DG DIGIT. It re-uses terms from several other vocabularues, notably DOAP (Description of a Project), DCAT (The Data Catalog Vocabulary) and Dublin Core with elements of SKOS, FOAF and more. The ADMS Concept Scheme, available at http://www.w3.org/ns/adms.html, defines its own lexical terms for its classes, properties and relationships.

E33

FAIR 27/48

Version Version 1.00 29 June 2012

Evaluated 26 Oct 2026

How scores work

Source & access

Homepagepurl.org DownloadCanonical file / PURL

Automated evaluation

F Findable FAIR4/12
  • Persistent identifier (F1)purl.org+4
  • Indexed in services (F4)not indexed anywhere0
  • Citable reference (F2)no reference publication listed0
A Accessible FAIR9/12
  • Homepage reachableHTTP 200+3
  • Artefact retrievable over HTTP(S) (A1)download HTTP 200+6
  • Metadata persists in a registry (A2)not in Bioregistry or OBO Foundry0
I Interoperable FAIR8/12
  • Formal machine-readable format (I1)OWL+5
  • Semantic-web IRIs (I2)OWL+3
  • References other vocabularies (I3)no imported vocabularies found0
R Reusable FAIR6/12
  • Clear license (R1.1)https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/category/licence/isa-open-metadata-licence-v11 (not a recognised open license)+2
  • Release provenance (R1.2)Version 1.00 29 June 2012 (version info in the artefact)+4
  • Community standards (R1.3)no independent compliance report (not on the OBO Dashboard)0
Q Ontology consistency & quality11/20
  • Logical consistencyconsistent, 0 unsatisfiable classes (ROBOT ELK in SchemaScope CI)+10
  • OWL 2 DL profileoutside OWL 2 DL0
  • Upper-ontology alignmentno BFO/COB/DOLCE import found0
  • Standard relations (RO)does not import the Relation Ontology0
  • ROBOT report: no errors40 errors0
  • ROBOT report: warning density82 warnings / 1 classes = 82.000
  • Pitfall scan: no critical pitfalls0 critical, 0 important, 0 minor pitfall types (SchemaScope Python scan (OOPS! pitfall subset))+1
M Maintenance0/16
  • Recencyno activity evidence0
  • Release cadence (12 months)0 releases0
U Community adoption0/16
  • Documented adopting projects0 projects0
  • Reused by other ontologies00
  • Community signalmax(stars 0 → 0, citations 0 → 0)0
P Penalties (inactivity & inconsistency)-5
  • No activity evidenceno commits, releases or dated files found-5
  • Inactive statusnot archived, legacy or inactive0
  • Consistencyconsistent, no unsatisfiable classes0
  • ROBOT report errors40 errors against OBO conventions; not penalised (not an OBO-style ontology)0

FAIR subtotal 27/48 · earned 38/100 − 5 inactivity = 33/100 → grade E

Community adoption 0

No adopting projects documented yet.

Know a project that uses ADMSSW? Suggest it.

History & changes 1 run

History starts with the first archived run; changes appear after the next evaluation.

RunScoreFAIRVersion evaluatedTermsSnapshot
26 Oct 2026, 03:31 UTC33 E27Version 1.00 29 June 2012—JSON

Provenance

Every fact on this page was fetched automatically. Each row shows where it came from and when. If a source fails, the last good value is kept and marked “carried forward”.

FactSourceRetrieved
Homepage link check (HTTP 200)purl.org26 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTC
Download link check (HTTP 200)purl.org26 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTC
Artefact header (version info)raw.githubusercontent.com26 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTC
ROBOT reason/report in SchemaScope CI—26 Oct 2026, 01:56 UTC
OOPS! pitfall scanoops.linkeddata.es26 Oct 2026, 01:56 UTC

Run 2026-10-26T02-37-38Z · evaluator v2.0.0 · rubric v3.4 · entry.json · run snapshot