Ontology

ORG

Core organization ontology

Vocabulary for describing organizational structures, specializable to a broad variety of types of organization.

digital planning and constructioneconomicsfid baudigitalontologysocial sciencesw3c rec
D48

FAIR 32/48

Version 0.8

Evaluated 26 Oct 2026

How scores work

Source & access

Portals & registries

SourceIDVersionClassesPropertiesIndividualsLoaded
TIB Terminology Serviceorg0.8155311 Aug 2023
Logical consistency (ROBOT ELK)
consistent · 0 unsatisfiable
ROBOT report
192 errors · 47 warnings

OOPS!: 0 critical · 2 important · 1 minor pitfall types

Also registered as
tib.ts: org

Automated evaluation

F Findable FAIR3/12
  • Persistent identifier (F1)no PURL / w3id / DOI for the artefact0
  • Indexed in services (F4)2: TIB, Bioregistry+3
  • Citable reference (F2)no reference publication listed0
A Accessible FAIR12/12
  • Homepage reachableHTTP 200+3
  • Artefact retrievable over HTTP(S) (A1)download HTTP 200+6
  • Metadata persists in a registry (A2)Bioregistry+3
I Interoperable FAIR8/12
  • Formal machine-readable format (I1)OWL, Turtle+5
  • Semantic-web IRIs (I2)OWL, Turtle+3
  • References other vocabularies (I3)no imported vocabularies found0
R Reusable FAIR9/12
  • Clear license (R1.1)PDDL-1.0+5
  • Release provenance (R1.2)0.8 (version info in the artefact)+4
  • Community standards (R1.3)no independent compliance report (not on the OBO Dashboard)0
Q Ontology consistency & quality11/20
  • Logical consistencyconsistent, 0 unsatisfiable classes (ROBOT ELK in SchemaScope CI)+10
  • OWL 2 DL profileoutside OWL 2 DL0
  • Upper-ontology alignmentno BFO/COB/DOLCE import found0
  • Standard relations (RO)does not import the Relation Ontology0
  • ROBOT report: no errors192 errors0
  • ROBOT report: warning density47 warnings / 1 classes = 47.000
  • Pitfall scan: no critical pitfalls0 critical, 2 important, 1 minor pitfall types (SchemaScope Python scan (OOPS! pitfall subset))+1
M Maintenance2/16
  • Recency2025-09-05 → 13.7 months (≤ 2 years)+2
  • Release cadence (12 months)0 releases0
U Community adoption4/16
  • Documented adopting projects0 projects0
  • Reused by other ontologies34 vocabularies (LOV)+4
  • Community signalmax(stars 0 → 0, citations 0 → 0)0
P Penalties (inactivity & inconsistency)-1
  • Time since last activity1.1 years → 4 × max(0, 1.1 − 1)-1
  • Inactive statusnot archived, legacy or inactive0
  • Consistencyconsistent, no unsatisfiable classes0
  • ROBOT report errors192 errors against OBO conventions; not penalised (not an OBO-style ontology)0

FAIR subtotal 32/48 · earned 49/100 − 1 inactivity = 48/100 → grade D

Community adoption 0

No adopting projects documented yet.

Know a project that uses ORG? Suggest it.

History & changes 1 run

History starts with the first archived run; changes appear after the next evaluation.

RunScoreFAIRVersion evaluatedTermsSnapshot
26 Oct 2026, 03:31 UTC48 D320.8—JSON

Provenance

Every fact on this page was fetched automatically. Each row shows where it came from and when. If a source fails, the last good value is kept and marked “carried forward”.

FactSourceRetrieved
Homepage link check (HTTP 200)w3.org26 Oct 2026, 03:12 UTC
Download link check (HTTP 200)w3.org26 Oct 2026, 03:12 UTC
Artefact header (version info)w3.org26 Oct 2026, 03:12 UTC
TIB Terminology Service metricsservice.tib.eu26 Oct 2026, 03:12 UTC
Bioregistry mappings, dependencies & reusebioregistry.io26 Oct 2026, 03:12 UTC
ROBOT reason/report in SchemaScope CI—26 Oct 2026, 02:14 UTC
OOPS! pitfall scanoops.linkeddata.es25 Oct 2026, 21:55 UTC

Run 2026-10-26T02-37-38Z · evaluator v2.0.0 · rubric v3.4 · entry.json · run snapshot