Vocabulary

ac.variant

Audubon Core Variant Controlled Vocabulary

Audubon Core uses the terms ac:variant and ac:variantLiteral to provide information about the size, extent, and availability of the Service Access Point of a media item. This controlled vocabulary provides values for those terms.

acfair data spaceslife sciences, biologyontology
E30

FAIR 28/48

Evaluated 26 Oct 2026

How scores work

Source & access

Portals & registries

SourceIDVersionClassesPropertiesIndividualsLoaded
TIB Terminology Serviceacvariant—216221 Oct 2026
Logical consistency (ROBOT ELK)
consistent · 0 unsatisfiable
ROBOT report
6 errors · 2 warnings

OOPS!: 1 critical · 1 important · 0 minor pitfall types

Also registered as
tib.ts: acvariant

Automated evaluation

F Findable FAIR3/12
  • Persistent identifier (F1)no PURL / w3id / DOI for the artefact0
  • Indexed in services (F4)2: TIB, Bioregistry+3
  • Citable reference (F2)no reference publication listed0
A Accessible FAIR12/12
  • Homepage reachableHTTP 200+3
  • Artefact retrievable over HTTP(S) (A1)download HTTP 200+6
  • Metadata persists in a registry (A2)Bioregistry+3
I Interoperable FAIR8/12
  • Formal machine-readable format (I1)RDF+5
  • Semantic-web IRIs (I2)RDF+3
  • References other vocabularies (I3)no imported vocabularies found0
R Reusable FAIR5/12
  • Clear license (R1.1)CC BY 4.0+5
  • Release provenance (R1.2)no version in artefact, registry or release tags0
  • Community standards (R1.3)no independent compliance report (not on the OBO Dashboard)0
Q Ontology consistency & quality10/20
  • Logical consistencyconsistent, 0 unsatisfiable classes (ROBOT ELK in SchemaScope CI)+10
  • OWL 2 DL profileoutside OWL 2 DL0
  • Upper-ontology alignmentno BFO/COB/DOLCE import found0
  • Standard relations (RO)does not import the Relation Ontology0
  • ROBOT report: no errors6 errors0
  • ROBOT report: warning density2 warnings / 1 classes = 2.000
  • Pitfall scan: no critical pitfalls1 critical, 1 important, 0 minor pitfall types (SchemaScope Python scan (OOPS! pitfall subset))0
M Maintenance0/16
  • Recencyno activity evidence0
  • Release cadence (12 months)0 releases0
U Community adoption0/16
  • Documented adopting projects0 projects0
  • Reused by other ontologies00
  • Community signalmax(stars 0 → 0, citations 0 → 0)0
P Penalties (inactivity & inconsistency)-8
  • No activity evidenceno commits, releases or dated files found-5
  • Inactive statusnot archived, legacy or inactive0
  • Consistencyconsistent, no unsatisfiable classes0
  • Critical pitfalls1 critical pitfall type (P39) × 3-3
  • ROBOT report errors6 errors against OBO conventions; not penalised (not an OBO-style ontology)0

FAIR subtotal 28/48 · earned 38/100 − 8 inactivity = 30/100 → grade E

Community adoption 0

No adopting projects documented yet.

Know a project that uses ac.variant? Suggest it.

History & changes 1 run

History starts with the first archived run; changes appear after the next evaluation.

RunScoreFAIRVersion evaluatedTermsSnapshot
26 Oct 2026, 03:31 UTC30 E28——JSON

Provenance

Every fact on this page was fetched automatically. Each row shows where it came from and when. If a source fails, the last good value is kept and marked “carried forward”.

FactSourceRetrieved
Homepage link check (HTTP 200)rs.tdwg.org26 Oct 2026, 02:37 UTC
Download link check (HTTP 200)rs.tdwg.org26 Oct 2026, 02:37 UTC
Artefact headerrs.tdwg.org26 Oct 2026, 02:37 UTC
TIB Terminology Service metricsservice.tib.eu26 Oct 2026, 02:37 UTC
Bioregistry mappings, dependencies & reusebioregistry.io26 Oct 2026, 02:37 UTC
ROBOT reason/report in SchemaScope CI—26 Oct 2026, 01:18 UTC
OOPS! pitfall scanoops.linkeddata.es26 Oct 2026, 01:18 UTC

Run 2026-10-26T02-37-38Z · evaluator v2.0.0 · rubric v3.4 · entry.json · run snapshot